|
Classification system (final)
Updated on January 7, 2006
The new classification
system that has been used in the new Catalogue of Joint Issues 2006
is now available as a pdf file
The text provided below is a non-illustrated summary
of this classification system
Joint issue: Definition
A Joint Issue can be declared only when two or
more independent postal administrations sign an agreement to create
new postage stamps or items for postal use with a common interest
and issue them within a pre-defined timeframe
Details:
· two or more: there is no limitation in the number
of countries involved. A series becomes an "omnibus series"
if the same printing house is producing all stamps for all countries
for economic reason (abusive issues" and not when it is linked
to the number of countries or the fact that these countries are
administratively dependent.
· independent: Only postally independent countries
can be involved. This excludes colonies and territories if the stamps
are issued only together with the mother country. Territorial or
Colonial issues become a specific sub-class. On the contrary if
another independent country is involved, the whole territorial or
colonial issues become part of the joint issue
· postal administrations: not to be confused with
printing house. Therefore omnibus series produced at a same printing
site (House of Questa, Crown's agent,
) for which only the
name of the country is modified will not be considered as joint
issues. On top of that, the country (postal administration) must
be recognized by the UPU at the time of release of the stamps.
· signature: The issue has to be approved as joint
by both (or more) postal administrations during at least the preparation
or design phase. Therefore issues discussed at the level of the
UPu or any type of collectivity or organization (SAARC, Norden,
OPEC, Arab League, CEPT,
) must be considered as joint as
well.
· agreement: either an official statement by one of
the postal administration must be published, or mixed official covers
are produced by the administrations (and not a dealer or privately).
Therefore the use of first day covers completed with stamps from
the second country after the issue of the stamps of the first country
(post-cancellation) cannot be considered as joint issue. For most
of the older issues it is difficult to provide this proof. Therefore,
in main cases a special sub-class was proposed (waiting list).
· new: reprint of older issues are not accepted, nor
overprinted stamps can be considered as joint issues
· postage stamps or items: stamps, souvenir sheets
and booklets are the most common items used in joint issues, but
postal stationery such as cards, letters, aerogrammes can be part
of joint issues as well. Even revenue stamps and stamp labels could
be accepted
· postal use: any item produced within this frame
must be accepted as payment for mailing. Therefore if only documents
without postal value are produced, the issue cannot be considered
as joint. Of course complementary material without postal value
(e.g. black prints, assays,
) to a true joint issue will be
described
· common interest: all stamps have to be commemorative
stamps (topical or anniversary) and preferably related to an event
that is common to both countries
· defined timeframe: the time between the two dates
of issues must be as short as possible. This time will define sub-classes
of joint issues (twin, parallel or concerted). However, it can happen
that for technical or political reason the difference between two
issues can be as big as several months. These issues will be accepted
as well. Aborted joint issues will be considered also each time
the information is available.
Two characters are used to describe a joint issue subtype. The
first letter stands for the sub-group: U: Unique, S:
Siamese, T: Twin, C: Concerted, P: Parallel.
The first part groups all "true" joint issues, including
those that did fail. Subclasses are detailed by using a figure.
In the second part are gathered all joint issues that have to be
considered as "doubtful" or "not true joint issues".
They use the same lettering system (T, C and P)
followed by another letter explaining the sub-class: O: Omnibus,
D: Territorial (or Colonial) - Dependencies, A: Accidental.
Part 1: True joint issues
sub-classes
Part 1 collects all series for which it is obvious that there was
at least a will to produce joint issues together, either based on
the design or the date of issue. The difficulty to add new series
to these lists starts when some of the countries are politically
linked to each other. If more than two countries are involved in
a series, two countries are sufficient to define the group to which
this series will belong. Therefore, when only two countries issue
identical stamps at the same date beside several other countries
issuing stamps at different dates or with different designs, these
two countries will define the priority in the classification system.
1.1. Unique and Siamese Issues
Unique issue
U1 One single stamp (or postal item) issued for two countries
Names of both countries present on the stamp - Liechtenstein - Switzerland
(1995)
U2 One single stamp (or postal item) issued for two countries
No name of country on the stamp, but used in several countries -
Austria - Hungary (1 June 1867)
UT Territorial Unique Issue One single stamp (or postal item)
issued for different territories or colonies. Unique issue involving
dependent countries (extremely rare and should normally belong to
Part II - no sufficient examples to create a specific sub-group
in Part II) - No example known up to now
Siamese issue
S1 Two stamps from different countries, issued se-tenant
or part of the same souvenir sheet Stamps with the same design that
can be separated to be used in their respective country - Italy
and San Marino (8 October 1994)
S2 Two stamps from different countries, issued se-tenant
or part of the same souvenir sheet Stamps with a different designAlthough
se-tenant, stamps can be used for postage only in their originating
countries - Yugoslavia and Romania (1965)
ST Territorial Siamese issue Two stamps from different territories
(or colonies), issued se-tenant or part of the same souvenir sheet
Siamese issue involving dependent countries (extremely rare and
should normally belong to Part II - no sufficient examples to create
a specific sub-group in Part II) - St Helena, Ascension, Tristan
da Cunha (4 May 1976)- Tonga and Niuafo'ou (July 1998)
1.2. Stamps with the same design
Twin issue
T1 Identical stamps issued on the same day. Most common case,
basis of the Joint Issues collection Difference between dates of
issue can be up to one week.
In some very specific cases, territorial issues (normally classified
as TD) can be found in this class, e.g. when only one territory
is linked with a specific topic to the father country: Portugal
- Macao (9 June 1997)
T2 Identical stamps issued on the same day (several countries
involved) When more than two countries are involved but not all
of them are issued on the same day, the most common day will be
kept - Europa CEPT stamps with the same design and with less than
half of the countries being issued at the same date
T3 Similar stamps issued on the same day The design is the
same, but one item or part of the design is adapted to the specific
country. If there are only differences due to size, printing processes,
paper quality, colors or perforations, these stamps will still be
considered as T1 - Germany - Japan (1996)
T4 Identical souvenir sheets issued on the same day with
different stamp cuts. The basic design of the souvenir sheet is
the same for both countries, but stamps including printing of the
country name and denomination are taken for each country at different
positions in the souvenir sheet. Once cut out from the souvenir
sheets, stamps should be classified as P1. Jersey Guernesey
(1 October 1994)
TX Identical stamps issued on the same day
but without
real proof that the stamps were really issued jointly. They could
be T1 stamps. Classified as TX until more information
is available - Pilgrimage to La Mecca (1979) - Egypt (7 November)
- Iraq (9 November) - Kuwait (9 November) - Oman (1 November) -
Saudi Arabia (6 November)
Concerted issue
C1 Identical stamps issued at different dates Difference
between dates of issues superior to one week. Postal administrations
must claim the stamp being issued jointly and explain the difference
C2 Identical stamps issued at different dates This sub-class
contains also stamps that were initially not announced as joint,
but for which one country offered the design to another country
for implementation in their philatelic program
These stamps will be sub classified as C2 only if known -
Spain and Chile or Bolivia
CX Identical stamps issued at different dates Same as C1
but no proof with mixed cover. Joint issue for which there is still
a doubt will in this class as long as they cannot be categorized
as C1, C2, CD, CO or CA
1.3. Official Joint Issues
Parallel issue
P1 Different stamp design but issued at the same date Difference
between dates of issue can be up to one week. Postal administrations
must claim the stamp being issued jointly and explain the difference
of design or official (not private) mixed cover exists
P2 Different stamp design but issued at the same date. Same
as above but no proof with mixed cover. Joint issue for which there
is still a doubt will remain in this class as long they cannot be
categorized as P1 or PA
Delayed (Retarded) joint issue
R1 Different design and different initial date but postal
agreement Production of one stamp by one country and existence of
official mixed covers by using one previously issued stamp from
the other country with authorizations from both postal administrations
France and Switzerland (Leman Lake, 19 February 1985)
R2 Delayed - double anniversary issue.Different designs and
different initial dates but postal agreement. Delay officially acknowledged
and due to the time gap between two linked events, that happened
consecutively in both countries. Departure from Pitcairn (3 May
1981) and arrival at Norfolk (5 June 1981)
1.4. Uncompleted Joint Issues
Non issued or Aborted
N Uncompleted issue Counterpart stamp missing or stamps that
were finally not issued (however designer and printing samples exist),
or printed later at another occasion, although the agreement between
the postal administration was published
Argentina and Brazil
Part 2: Common issues sub-classes
Colonies, territories, omnibus series, joint issues with too
large time between their issue date and false joint issues are collected
in this second part. For purists, all these stamps should not be
considered as joint issues.
2.1. Territorial and colonial (Dependencies)
Issues
As the definition of a colony
differs from one country to another, there will be no splitting
between territorial and colonial issues. The term territorial includes
all countries that are "postally" dependent from another,
whatever they are called colonies, territories, oversea department,
dominions, etc. Once such a territory gains its complete postal
independence and produces its own stamps all different from the
"politically" parent country, it will be considered as
a country per se. If only a sub-group of the colonies or territories
is involved (without participation of the father country) and if
the topic is related to a local event, then these stamps will be
considered as normal Twin (T1/T2/T3) or Joint (C1/C2
or P1/P2) series.
TD Territorial (or colonial) twin issue. Identical stamps
issued by postally dependent territories (or colonies) at the same
date List of administrations considered as territories is given
elsewhere. However stamps issued jointly with another country than
the father country must be considered in Part I, T1/T2 -
Dutch Antilles - Netherlands - Surinam (29 June 1971).Overprinted
territorial twin issues with different colors will be classified
under this heading as well.
CD Territorial (or colonial) concerted issue. Identical stamps
issued by postally dependent territories (or colonies) at different
dates List of administrations considered as territories is given
elsewhere. However stamps issued jointly with another country than
the father country must be considered in Part I, C1/C2
PD Territorial (or colonial) parallel issue. Different stamps
issued by postally dependent territories (or colonies) at the same
date List of administrations considered as territories is given
elsewhere. However stamps issued jointly with another country than
the father country must be considered in Part I, P1/P2
2.2. Omnibus Series (**)
Omnibus Series include all large series of stamps printed at
a same place by the same printing house for countries that are not
linked politically. British Territories issues from the 40's and
50's have got the generic catalogue name of "omnibus series",
due to the number of countries involved, but they cannot be considered
under this heading, as at that time, these countries were directly
governed by Great Britain. Therefore these series will be classified
as Colonial/Territorial under TD, CD or PD and the
following issues become TO, CO or PO series as soon
as independent countries participate to the issue. Actually the
modification of classification is linked to the date at which the
country gained its independence. In case of doubt, the double classification
may be used (e.g. TO/TD) as some collectors may also want
to consider the classical omnibus series under the heading TO
and not TD.
Usually omnibus series involve at least five countries and the total
number can go higher than 20. However some of the series that are
produced on the basis of the same design by the same printing house
can be limited to as low as two countries. If it is obvious that
there is no postal or political link between these countries, these
stamps will still be classified under this heading "omnibus"
and the definition will be precised as "Same printing house
series".
Series initiated by an association of countries (e.g. Arab League,
Europa/CEPT, OPEC, SAARC, Norden,
) cannot be considered as
omnibus series.
Omnibus series
SO Siamese omnibus series. Stamps from different countries
se-tenant; Design is similar, but stamps can be different. Of course
common printing house. Produced as copies of each other in order
to reduce printing costs. Usually the number of involved countries
is much higher than five.
TO Twin omnibus (or same printing house) series. Same or
common design and same date of issue In all cases, common printing
house Produced as copies of each other in order to reduce printing
costs. Usually the number of involved countries is much higher than
five. Example: 1981 (22 July), involving 39 countries. The criteria
for switching from Territorial TD to Omnibus TO is
the presence of independent countries, in this case Gambia or Sierra
Leone.
CO Concerted omnibus (or same printing house) series. Similar
design, but different date of issue In all cases, common printing
house. Produced as copies of each other in order to reduce printing
costs. Usually the number of involved countries is higher than five.
Example: Stamps "United we stand" commemorating the 11
September attack by several countries at different dates during
2002, showing each the local flag.
PO Parallel omnibus (or same printing house) series. Same
date of issue but different design In all cases, common printing
house. Actually design remains similar (frame) and stamps are produced
as copies of each other in order to reduce printing costs. Usually
the number of involved countries is higher than five. Example 1986
(23 July) Prince Andrews marriage with Sarah Ferguson: design for
all stamps is similar but the central photograph is different for
each one
2.3. Accidental Joint Issues
Accidental Twin Issue
TA Same design and same date of issue
but obviously
no. Twin Issue, as they are issued without agreement between postal
administrations. Usually these stamps are issued at an anniversary
date and are based on the same painting or picture
Ex.: On the 150th birthday (1972) of Louis Pasteur several countries
issued a stamp in honour of the scientist and used the same classical
painting.
Accidental Concerted Issue
CA Same design but different date of issue and no link between
countries. Obviously stamps being produced based on the same design
(e.g. portrait, logo, painting,
). Some issues can have several
years of difference. Ex: France and Venezuela used exactly the same
logo for their anti-smoking campaign. Stamps are almost identical.
The first one was issued on 5 April 1980, the second one on 27 May
1993.
Accidental Parallel Issue
PA Same topic and same date of issue but different design
Obviously not a joint issue as, for example, those stamps produced
at an anniversary date, but without agreement between postal administrations
- Enrico Fermi, USA - Italy (2002)
Borrowed design
BD Same design as an already existing joint issue, but not
being part of this issue Includes also shared, rented, borrowed
or even stolen designs - Bulgaria, parallel to the Norden issues.
Will be described with the original basis design
2.4. Non-Accepted Joint Issues (non exhaustive
lists)
Overprinted Issue
OP Common date, but only overprinted stamps The issues that
will be reported are exceptions. Overprinted stamps are normally
excluded from the scope
Non-commemorative issues
NC Common date and common design but definitive stamps Definitive
stamps are excluded from the scope - Usually first colonial stamps
Non UPU recognized countries
NR Stamps issued by countries not recognized by the UPU Joint
issues are limited to countries that have a political and postal
worldwide accepted existence at the time of issue of the stamp -
Abkhazia and Ossetia (1996)
Common issue
CM Same topic but different design and different date of
issue Except as examples, those will not be reported in the catalogue
False joint issue
FJ Only the topic is common Any stamp pair that does not
fit with one of the above definitions - Non exhaustive list of common
design or topic stamps issued the same year, but definitely not
as joint issue
2.5. Joint Cancellations (non exhaustive
list)
Common cancellation
JC Creation of a specific cancellation Agreement between
postal administrations to cancel jointly stamps with similar topics.
Non-exhaustive list. The issues that will be reported are exceptions.
|